Why make it about boys and girls. Instead, let’s create a rich, varied education experience for everyone?

I read this NYT Opinion piece today, which argues that boys learn differently than girls and that we need teachers to be “boy-friendly.”  Here is my response.

Are the bell curves really so distinct that this is truly about boys vs girls? Even if the peaks of the curve are offset in “small but real” ways, aren’t nearly all people in the huge overlap of experience?

Regardless of gender, we obviously have some learners who prefer moving, sitting still, talking, quiet reflection, competition, striving for oneself, creating, negotiating, language or logic.  Why argue for a best answer, rather than creating a rich and varied experience for all students by offering different experiences at different times in our classrooms.  I know that it is possible because I’ve experienced it as a student as A Growing Place, a Montessori preschool and kindergarten, and at The College School, an experiential education grade school, and as a teacher at the Chewonki Semester School for 11th graders.

Most importantly, by classifying these behaviors as gendered, we fail our quieter, reflective boys and we fail our boisterous, creative girls.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s